Legal Opinion

Becker Steel Co. of America v. Cummings

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit is brought under the Trading with the Enemy Act, as- amended, 50 U.S. C.A.appendix, § 1 et seq. The motion is by the defendants to dismiss the bill as insufficient on its face.

The controversy is one of long standing. The averments in the bill show this state of affairs: The Alien Property Custodian in 1918 seized property belonging to the plaintiff, a West Virginia corporation controlled wholly by citizens of the United States, and sold the seized property for $20,000. In 1922 the plaintiff brought suit in this court under section 9 (a) of the Trading with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Root v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Schuler v. IsraelSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern California Edison Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API