Legal Opinion

Purnell v. Gillespie

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921No. 21852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from chancery court of Leflore county. Hon. G. E. Williams, Chancellor. Suit hy Robert H. Gillespie against B. R. Purnell. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is a suit by which the appellee seeks to recover from the appellant an alleged balance due on a promissory note. The bill alleges, among other things, that on the 12th day of July, 1913, the appellant, B. R. Purnell, and B. D. *61Austin and J. F. Lunstall purchased certain land from the Kennedy Heading Company, and executed to it two promissory notes, each for seven thousand, seven hundred seventy-three dollars and seventy-five cents, one due and payable twelve months and the other twenty-four months after date, and secured by a vendor’s lien reserved in the deed to the land. That the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowish v. First Nat. Bank of MariettaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. Shelton v. . CodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API