Smith v. McClam
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Justice:
This action was instituted by the respondents, daughters of Lero McClam, to set aside two deeds executed by respondent Lero McClam to their brother, Donald McClam, who is the appellant in this action. The trial court set aside the deeds. We affirm.
The daughters contend that in 1958, they conveyed their interest in two tracts of land to their mother, Lero McClam, in consideration for her promise that she would hold the property during her lifetime and at her death, convey the property equally to all her children. They argue the conveyance of the tracts to Donald in 1966 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peay v. SeiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Johnstone v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Scott v. SCOTTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Walker v. PreacherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Barr v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- South Carolina Federal Savings Bank v. San-A-Bel Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Beckham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Smith v. FedorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Essential Housing v. Landev InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.