Legal Opinion
Porazzo v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated January 18, 2006, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on an alleged violation of Labor Law § 241 (6).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In response to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawyer v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Morra v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Constantino v. Kreisler Borg Florman General Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Roberts v. Worth Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- McKee v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Raffa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Enriquez v. B & D Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Raffa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Vindell v. Site 2 DSA Owner, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025