Legal Opinion

Terwelp v. Sass

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1982No. 4-82-0328PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WEBBER

delivered the opinion of the court:

The case at bar is in the nature of the classic encroachment and boundary dispute resulting in a feud. Apparently, the parties are willing to spend endless time and money in furtherance of this feud. The plaintiffs-counterdefendants-appellees (plaintiffs) constructed a barn which lay in part across a north-south center section line. The plaintiffs brought an action for temporary and permanent injunctive relief seeking to prevent defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of their barn. Defendants-counterplaintiffs-appellants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prall v. BurckharttIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Grube v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Clokey v. Wabash Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hooper v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Russell v. City of LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kirnbauer v. Cook County Forest Preserve DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Emalfarb v. KraterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. First Illinois Bank of Wilmette v. ValentineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. City of Rochelle v. SuskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People Ex Rel. Kenney v. City of GorevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API