Legal Opinion

People v. Lioto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that his plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered, and that the plea colloquy was not coercive (see generally, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543-544; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9,19). By the time of sentencing, defendant had twice been found competent, and there is nothing in the record at the time of the plea to suggest that defendant was unable to understand the charges or assist in his defense (see, People v Franco, 120 AD2d 609, 610, lv denied 68 NY2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. FigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. CorwiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. GonzalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BettingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. LiotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API