Legal Opinion

Haskin v. Haskin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 10, 1996No. 95-1372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

677 So.2d 376 (1996)

Judith HASKIN, Appellant,

v.

Eugene HASKIN, Appellee.

No. 95-1372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 10, 1996.

Robert Resnick, Gulf Stream, for appellant.

Barry S. Franklin, of Franklin & Marbin, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

We reverse the trial court's order involuntarily dismissing the former wife's (appellant) action to modify her alimony award, and remand for a new hearing.

It is proper to enter an involuntary dismissal only when the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, fails to establish a prima facie case…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palm Beach Mall, Inc. v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Cohen v. BOCA WOODS CTRY. CL. PROP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lustig v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Bottalico v. AntonelliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Van Asten v. CostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Janet Stone and Robert StoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API