Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1973No. 72-92PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence of life imprisonment entered upon a finding of guilty of the offense of robbery. His defense at trial was that he was legally insane at the time he performed the act charged.

Appellant urges that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial or, in the alternative, in refusing to instruct the jury to disregard certain improper remarks made by the prosecutor in closing argument.

During defense counsel’s final argument to the jury he said:

“But that isn’t what we are asking you to say because not guilty by reason of insanity is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pait v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Chavez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Ricks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Sadler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Reyes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API