Legal Opinion
Lustig v. Longchamps, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*929In our opinion, examination with respect to the items allowed is material and necessary for plaintiff’s preparation of this action for trial. Upon the termination of the examination he should then be able to furnish an accurate and comprehensive bill of particulars. The service of such a bill will be more conducive to orderly and expeditious procedure. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Wenzel, Mac Crate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Cornell v. Mor-Nell Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- King v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Carney v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of FelterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Eisenstaedt v. SchweitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.