Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Eckhardt

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1929No. 937-5042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

In a suit for damages on account of delay in delivery of an unrepeated interstate message, defendant in error was awarded a judgment against plaintiff in error for the sum of $500, with 6 per cent, interest thereon from the date of the accrual of the cause of action.

It is insisted by plaintiff in error that this item of interest was improperly allowed because the maximum liability, on an unre.peated message, was expressly limited to the sum of $500, by reason of the following stipulation contained in the contract of transmission:

“The company shall not be liable for mistakes or delays in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Bradley v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lawson v. SpragueWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Sharp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Southmore Savings AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McMillen Feeds, Inc. of Texas v. HarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Cudmore v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. McDonald v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Marion v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API