Maryl v. Hernandez

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

This is a revised opinion issued pursuant to appellee’s petition for rehearing. Ap-pellee’s petition pointed out certain errors in our statement of the facts of the case which have been corrected by this revised opinion.

The question to be determined on this appeal is whether it was error for the trial court to refuse to consider a claim of exemption from garnishment under F.S. § 222.11, F.S.A. This section together with F.S. § 222.12, F.S.A. provides for an exemption of wages from garnishment for the head of a family. The sections are as follows:

“222.11 Exemption of wages…