Legal Opinion

State v. Henson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 1994No. 99, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We granted the State’s petition for certiorari to resolve whether, when the State, in good faith, dismisses charges pending against a defendant and later indicts that defendant for the same charges, the period between the defendant’s arrest on the initial charges and his indictment is included in the speedy trial calculus. The motions judge held that it is not. 1 On direct appeal, the Court of Special Appeals, in an unreported opinion, held to the contrary—that the time for speedy trial analysis in this case began to run from the date of the initial arrest. Consequently, it…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Divver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. State of Maine v. Nicholas W. NorrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  4. Malik v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API