Legal Opinion

Neubauer v. Neubauer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order should be affirmed.

Balancing the financial circumstances of the parties, their age, health, station in life and preseparation standard of living, it is evident that the upward modification of the award of permanent alimony by the Appellate Division was justified (see Hickland v Hickland, 39 NY2d 1; Kay v Kay, 37 NY2d 632; Kover v Kover, 29 NY2d 408). It is not disputed that, among other considerations, the wife has neither capital assets, income, nor any employable skills. She also suffers from a long-standing emotional problem requiring constant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Hickland v. HicklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Kover v. KoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Mittman v. MittmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Match v. MatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API