Legal Opinion

Holihan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 14, 1999No. 95-399VPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case is before the court on respondent’s motion for review of a special master’s award on a petition for compensation brought under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (Vaccine Act or Act), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (1994).1 The issue on review is whether the special master’s legal interpretation of § 15(a)(3)(B), resulting in an award of lost earnings to the vaccinee, was correct as a matter of law.2 For the reasons set forth below, the special master’s decision is reversed.

FACTS

The following facts derive from the special master’s opinion and are…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dean v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Dupuch-Carron v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API