Holihan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court on respondent’s motion for review of a special master’s award on a petition for compensation brought under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (Vaccine Act or Act), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (1994).1 The issue on review is whether the special master’s legal interpretation of § 15(a)(3)(B), resulting in an award of lost earnings to the vaccinee, was correct as a matter of law.2 For the reasons set forth below, the special master’s decision is reversed.
FACTS
The following facts derive from the special master’s opinion and are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dean v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Dupuch-Carron v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Griffin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014