Faulkner v. Mammoth Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Juab County. — Hon. W. M. McCarty, Judge. ' - Action by Joseph Faulkner against tbe Mammoth Mining Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBasetn, J.
The complaint, in substance, alleges that the plaintiff on the fifteenth of June, 1898, was an employee *439of the defendant, and as such was working as a miner in the defendant’s mine; that the defendant negligently suffered and permitted the underground workings where the plaintiff was engaged at work under the order and directions of the defendant to become and be in an' unsafe and dangerous condition, as the defendant well knew, by reason of negligently failing and neglecting to remove decayed portions of the timbers, and by negligently failing to properly timber said workings, and causing…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Miner v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Christianson v. Pacific Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Toone v. J. P. O'neill Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
- Cripple Creek Mining Co. v. BrabantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- City of Greeley v. FosterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.