Legal Opinion

Helms v. Metropolitan Toyota, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1989No. Civ. 6680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

J. ED TEASE, Retired Circuit Judge.

In this malicious prosecution case the trial court granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict at close of plaintiffs’ ease, and plaintiffs appeal.

Whether the trial court erred to reversal by granting such motion is the sole issue presented on appeal.

Plaintiffs-appellants were used automobile dealers in the spring of 1985 when they purchased a 1979 Oldsmobile from defendant, Metropolitan Toyota, for $2,400. Appellants received the vehicle and were to pay the purchase price when they received the title from Metropolitan. Receipt of the title was delayed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boothby Realty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Maddox v. Druid City Hospital Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Arrington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. American Surety Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Evans v. ALA. PROF. HEALTH CONSULTANTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CortnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API