Legal Opinion

Hoult v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 21, 1931No. Docket Nos. 45782, 45783Published

During the years 1922 to 1924 each petitioner purchased over 600 shares of stock in the Morton Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation, at a price exceeding $130 a share. During the taxable year 1927 one Joseph H. Brewer organized the Grand Rapids Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation. Petitioners agreed with Brewer to sell him their stock in the Morton Hotel Company for $50 a share and buy stock in the new company with the proceeds, which was done.

Read the full summary

During the years 1922 to 1924 each petitioner purchased over 600 shares of stock in the Morton Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation, at a price exceeding $130 a share. During the taxable year 1927 one Joseph H. Brewer organized the Grand Rapids Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation. Petitioners agreed with Brewer to sell him their stock in the Morton Hotel Company for $50 a share and buy stock in the new company with the proceeds, which was done. Held, petitioners did not in substance exchange old stock for new within the meaning of section 203(b)(2) of the Revenue Act of 1926, but actually…

1Opinion of the Court

J. HAMPTON HOULT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

MARTIN J. DREGGE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Hoult v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 45782, 45783.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

24 B.T.A. 79; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1700;

September 21, 1931, Promulgated

During the years 1922 to 1924 each petitioner purchased over 600 shares of stock in the Morton Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation, at a price exceeding $130 a share. During the taxable year 1927 one Joseph H. Brewer organized the Grand Rapids Hotel Company, a Michigan corporation. Petitioners…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoult v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API