Legal Opinion

Art E. Weiss Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 25, 1943No. C. D. 739Published

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Judge:

Tbe merchandise involved in this suit against the United States consists of certain moleskin plates which were assessed for duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1519 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “manufactures of fur * * * including plates * * * if dyed.” The claim in each case is that the merchandise is not dyed, and hence is entitled to classification under the same paragraph at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem, as plates of fur, not dyed.

A sample of the plates involved was identified by the single witness called by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tannage Patent Co. v. DonallanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API