Legal Opinion

Kroeger v. Marsh Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court.— Hon. Wm. G. Thompson, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries. On trial to a jury there was a verdict for defendant and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, J.

The allegations of error relate entirely to the giving of instructions, but as appellee contends that a verdict should have been directed for the defendant, and that, therefore, errors in the instructions were without prejudice, it will be necessary to state the facts disclosed in the record. This is necessary not only for the purpose of determining whether the case should have been submitted to the jury, but also, if we find the submission to have been proper, for the purpose of construing the instructions in relation to the evidence to ascertain whether in any respect there was error in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Stomne v. Hanford Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Brusseau v. Lower Brick Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Carver v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parkhill v. Bekin's Van & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Scott v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Carnego v. Crescent Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Kimmerle v. Dubuque Altar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Warner v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API