Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1957No. 36705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Courts will take judicial notice of the fact that the term “moonshine liquor” means whisky which has been illicitly, illegally, and clandestinely made, as it is common knowledge that that commodity known as moonshine whisky is an alcoholic liquor manufactured contrary to law in respect to which no tax is levied or may be collected. Everhart v. State, 194 Tenn. 272 (250 S. W. 2d 368, 369); Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853 (13 So. 2d 458, 461); State v. Tuten, 131 N. C. 701 (42 S. E. 443). See Code § 38-112, catchwords “Intoxicating liquors.” And, where, upon the trial of one charged with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. State v. Tuten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Everhart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API