Daniels v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
Courts will take judicial notice of the fact that the term “moonshine liquor” means whisky which has been illicitly, illegally, and clandestinely made, as it is common knowledge that that commodity known as moonshine whisky is an alcoholic liquor manufactured contrary to law in respect to which no tax is levied or may be collected. Everhart v. State, 194 Tenn. 272 (250 S. W. 2d 368, 369); Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853 (13 So. 2d 458, 461); State v. Tuten, 131 N. C. 701 (42 S. E. 443). See Code § 38-112, catchwords “Intoxicating liquors.” And, where, upon the trial of one charged with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- State v. Tuten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Everhart v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960