Legal Opinion

Tatum v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 17, 1979No. CR79-48PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of burglary in the Union Circuit Court on August 8, 1977, and > sentenced to a term of 30 years as a habitual criminal. It was stipulated he had three prior convictions. An in-custody confession by appellant was introduced over his objection, after a Denno hearing. Appellant did not testify at the trial.

It is argued on appeal that the confession was inadmissible because it was given 19 days after he had received the Miranda warning and upon the promise of a deputy sheriff that he would “do all he could to help him.” Appellant further contends…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payne v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Free v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Doby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Hamm v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API