Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Mayo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2000No. 20000032PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Pamela Mayo, now known as Pamela Banjac, appeals from a trial court amended judgment changing custody of the parties’ three minor children from her to William M. Mayo. We hold the trial court’s finding that there has been a substantial change of circumstances which requires, in the best interests of the children, a change of custody, is not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Pamela Banjac and William Mayo divorced in 1995. Banjac was awarded primary custody of their three children. Mayo was awarded reasonable visitation, which he exercised on a regular basis after the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holtz v. HoltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hill v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Myers v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Anderson v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API