McMillan v. Horne
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The record in this case presents one vital and controlling question: Was the evidence sufficient to go to the jury on the third issue? Ordinarily the last -clear chance involves the conduct of a defendant after his negligence and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence have had their play, still leaving the defendant time and opportunity to avoid the injury notwithstanding what both parties have previously done, or failed to do. In essence, the issue is one of proximate cause.
In passing on the question here presented, Justice Ervin, in Wade v. Sausage Co., 239 N.C. 524, 80 S.E. 2d 150, stated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Miller v. . Motor Freight Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Clodfelter v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Mathis v. MarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Scott v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cullen v. Logan Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.