Legal Opinion

Eatmon v. Penland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 16950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

This was an action upon -a promissory note brought in the court below by plaintiff in error, P. O. Ea'tmon. as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, J. H. Penland, administrator of the estate of Martha O. Eatmon, deceased, as defendant. Parties will be hereinafter designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The note sued on was dated October 29. '1920, due January 1, 1921 thereafter, was for the principal sum of $615, upon which it was alleged that defendant was entitled to a credit of $215, leaving an alleged balance due and unpaid of $475.93. The defendant, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hapke v. HapkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Collord v. CooleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Johnson v. HazaleusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Kennedy, Ex'rs v. Marshall, Ex'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Ricker v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. McGraw v. Bill Hodges Truck Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API