Legal Opinion
Hewitt v. Grabicki
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided October 23, 1984No. C-80-480-JLQPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.
This matter came on regularly for hearing with oral argument in Spokane, Washington on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. The Motion to Dismiss will be treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment due to the reference by plaintiff to various depositions and affidavits in his opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff was represented by Lawrence C. Smith; Assistant United States Attorney Carroll D. Gray appeared for defendants.
Plaintiff Dr. Hewitt was hired in December 1967 as a…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hewitt v. GrabickiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hewitt v. GrabickiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Millspaugh v. Wabash County Department of Public WelfareDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Frobish v. United States ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991