Legal Opinion

Corporation Commission v. . Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

His Honor instructed the jury to answer the issue in the affirmative if they believed all the evidence. In this instruction we think there was error. The stock appeared on the books of the bank as having been issued to and in the name of the defendant but this entry, while prima facie evidence of the defendant’s ownership, is not conclusive; the burden of the issue remained with the plaintiff throughout the trial to satisfy the jury by the greater weight of the evidence that the defendant Harris was a stockholder in the bank, as alleged. White v. Hines, 182 N. C., 276; Austin v. R. R., 187 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Austin v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marzec v. NyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. . GossettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. United States of America, Small Business Administration, Truduax Corporation, Claimant-Appellant v. Vanguard Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Corporation Commission of North Carolina v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API