Legal Opinion

Klemitt Construction Corp. v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

This motion by the defendant for partial summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action is granted.(1) The motion to dismiss the second cause of action is predicated on the one-year limitation of time within which to commence an action contained in the contract entered into between the parties. Such a provision has been recognized and enforced by the courts (Lowry v. Inman, 46 N. Y. 119; Fortunato v. Patten, 147 N. Y. 277; Sullivan v. Prudential Ins. Co., 172 N. Y. 482).(2) Pursuant to article 67 of the contract “no action shall lie or be maintained against the Board or the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lowry v. . InmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Woodcrest Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Sullivan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API