Legal Opinion

State v. Hutto

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 2021No. 122630PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,630 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MATTHEW DOUGLAS HUTTO, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts generally review a district court's decision to deny a postsentencing motion to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea for abuse of discretion. On appeal, the movant bears the burden to prove the district court erred in denying a motion to withdraw a plea. 2. Under K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22-3210(d)(2), after pronouncing sentence, a district court may set aside a judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw a plea in order to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. State v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. In re Parentage of R.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2023
  3. State v. RaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  4. State v. ShowalterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API