Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Kutz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1985No. 90PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

May a writ or a complaint filed in a civil action at law be served, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1009(a), by a constable who is not acting on the sheriffs behalf? Because the answer to this inquiry is “No”, we affirm the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County which dismissed Appellant's complaint.

In the instant case service of the Writ of Summons and later the Complaint was attempted when Michael Domkowski, a duly elected constable, personally delivered copies *135of these documents to the defendants. Domkowski, at the times service was attempted, was not acting for or on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cahill v. SchultsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Frycklund v. WaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Azzarrelli v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Johnson v. AllgeierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Williams, M. v. Jauregui, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API