Legal Opinion

James v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1964No. 9509PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Mr. and Mrs. Herb James, as plaintiffs (appellants herein)' instituted this action to recover damages for alleged deprivation of access to their business property. Subsequent to the filing of this action, Mr. James passed away; by stipulation his widow, the administratrix of his estate, has been substituted as a plaintiff.

Appellants by their complaint seek $40,000 damages for loss of value to their business property as a result of alleged impaired access'to it. To the complaint respondent filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court, under the provisions of I.R.C.P.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Rubano v. Department of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Moore v. BastianIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Symms v. Nelson Sand & Gravel, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bare v. Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API