Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fischer v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 21, 2004No. SC 85951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

The Director of Revenue sues pursuant to section 143.611, RSMo, to collect state income taxes for the years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996. The appellant filed no return for any of these years, and the Director estimated the taxes, pursuant to statutory authority. The appellant did not file a protest as permitted by section 143.631, which is the exclusive remedy for challenging the assessment. State ex rel. Lohman v. Latimer, 4 S.W.3d 560 (Mo.App.1999). The appellant, indeed, does not appear to challenge the amount of the assessment for any year, but raises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. White v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Lohman v. LatimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. WilkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Harry Fischer v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. State Ex Rel. Fischer v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API