Legal Opinion

Balthazar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1988No. 4-86-1413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm defendant’s conviction and apply the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof for evaluating the voluntariness of the defendant’s confession.

The preponderance of the evidence standard has been generally applied in Florida cases where the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession is at issue. See McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). We apply it here where the defendant is alleged to have a limited understanding of English. We agree with the state’s assertion that although its burden in proving voluntariness is a heavy one in such circumstances, the standard of proof does…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. DeConingh v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balthazar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API