Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
•GODDARD, District Judge.
In Admiralty. This is a suit by 22 seamen to recover a total of $7,273.50, which they claim as waiting time from February 21, 1920, to June 19, 1920, a period of 3 months *611and 27 days, under section 4529 of the United States Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 8320).
Facts.
The libelants signed shipping articles at Philadelphia August 22j 1919, for a voyage of the Steamship Nedmac to “So. America and such other ports and places in any part of the world as the master may direct, and back to a final port of discharge in the United States north of Cape Harteras for a term of time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- The CubadistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- The George W. WellsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Cliarz v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- McCrea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- McCrea v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Burie v. Overseas Navigation Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962