Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hanover Fire Insurance

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1943No. 2248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

These proceedings by direct appeal were instituted to review a judgment of the District Court of Natrona County in an action based on a fire insurance policy wherein C. P. Johnson was plaintiff and the Hanover Fire Insurance Company was defendant. Subsequently, the parties hereto will be designated respectively, C. P. Johnson as the “plaintiff” or by his surname and the Hanover Fire Insurance Company as the “insurer” or the “defendant”.

The facts necessary to be considered in order to dispose of this litigation are substantially these: The plaintiff is engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Tinsley v. Ætna InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. German Insurance v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Kuhn v. McKayWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Branson v. RoelofszWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Runnion v. KittsWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Culver v. SekulichWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Moncrief v. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Rafferty v. Northern Utilities Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API