Legal Opinion

Daigle v. Hibernia National Bank

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2006No. 2005 CA 2520Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID S. GORBATY, Judge Ad Hoc.

hln this appeal, plaintiff Michelle Daigle contends the trial court erred in granting the exception of no cause of action filed by Hibernia National Bank (“Hibernia”). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Daigle filed suit against Hibernia .and Bryan Peters. The lawsuit sought to annul an Assignment of Deposit Account (“Assignment”) between Michelle Daigle, as borrower, and Hibernia, lender. In the Assignment, Daigle purported to assign a deposit account in the amount of $50,000. The petition alleges that the Assignment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tweedel v. BrasseauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Guzzardo-Knight v. Central Progressive BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API