Legal Opinion

State v. Doogan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 3, 1996No. 35185-1-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Mary Ellen Doogan appeals her conviction for second degree promotion of prostitution. Because Doo-gan was denied effective assistance of counsel when her trial attorney proposed — and the jury received — an instruction including an uncharged alternative means, we reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial.

Doogan operated an escort service known as "A Personal Touch.” Two of her employees, Kristin Olson and Rebecca Lund, 1 testified at trial about their work for Doogan and Doogan’s knowledge of the sexual nature of their work. Each testified that she made house calls for A Personal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. TresenriterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API