State v. Doogan
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
Mary Ellen Doogan appeals her conviction for second degree promotion of prostitution. Because Doo-gan was denied effective assistance of counsel when her trial attorney proposed — and the jury received — an instruction including an uncharged alternative means, we reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial.
Doogan operated an escort service known as "A Personal Touch.” Two of her employees, Kristin Olson and Rebecca Lund, 1 testified at trial about their work for Doogan and Doogan’s knowledge of the sexual nature of their work. Each testified that she made house calls for A Personal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. StuddWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. TresenriterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.