Hubbard Bros. Construction v. C. F. Halstead Contractor, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentJones, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
The scope of appellate review of an order granting a motion for a new trial following a jury verdict is in dire need of modification and clarification. This appeal presents a classical opportunity for such effort. Any re-examination of the guidelines for the exercise of the discretionary power of the trial court to set aside a jury verdict must begin with the premise that the right of trial by jury is constitutionally mandated. Substantive due process of law is violated when this fundamental right is infringed.
A full statement of the case, as well as the factual context…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Carlisle v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Nooe's v. Garner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Johnson v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.