Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hubbard Bros. Construction v. C. F. Halstead Contractor, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 25, 1975No. SC 908Published

1DissentJones, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The scope of appellate review of an order granting a motion for a new trial following a jury verdict is in dire need of modification and clarification. This appeal presents a classical opportunity for such effort. Any re-examination of the guidelines for the exercise of the discretionary power of the trial court to set aside a jury verdict must begin with the premise that the right of trial by jury is constitutionally mandated. Substantive due process of law is violated when this fundamental right is infringed.

A full statement of the case, as well as the factual context…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Carlisle v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Nooe's v. Garner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Johnson v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API