Legal Opinion
State v. Andrews
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1997No. 16528PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
1. Defendant George Andrews appeals his conviction for concealing identity, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-22-3 (Repl. Pamp.1994). He raises two issues on appeal. The first challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction and the trial court’s interpretation of the statutory term “identity.” The second argues that the statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts in this case. This appeal presents us with an opportunity to address a reservation expressed in Nagol v. State, 923 F.Supp. 190, 196 n. 3 (D.N.M.1996), concerning the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SegottaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mocek v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ShijeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.