Legal Opinion

Farris v. Satzinger

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 21, 1987No. 86 C 20126PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.

This action comes before the court on the defendant, Forty Three Distributors, Ltd.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Count III of the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Taking the plaintiffs allegations as true, the following facts form the basis of the plaintiff’s motion. On or about May 17, 1984, the plaintiff, John Farris was engaged in his duties as a maintenance employee of Del Monte Corporation at De-Kalb, Illinois. At that place and time, John Farris, attempted to remove a Perma…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thomas v. Kaiser Agricultural ChemicalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohee v. McDadeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. LaRoe v. Cassens & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Indeck Power Equipment Co. v. Jefferson Smurfit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Ungaro v. Rosalco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Things Remembered, Inc. v. BGTV, INC.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API