Legal Opinion
Walker v. LeBlanc
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 2012No. 2012 CA 0764PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
12Plaintiffs, James and Raynette Walker, sued for damages arising from Mr. Walker’s personal injuries that occurred when he fed some bulls owned by defendants, Price and Shirley LeBlanc. The LeBlanes and their homeowners’ insurer, Farmers Insurance Exchange (“Farmers”), filed a motion for summary judgment, maintaining that the Walkers could not meet their burden of proving that the LeBlanes knew or should have known that the bulls were dangerous or that Mr. Walker’s injuries could have been prevented with reasonable care. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the LeBlanes…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. McDanielLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- McGehee v. City/Parish of East Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Brewton v. Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Lewis v. Four Corners Volunteer Fire Dept.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Granger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kasem v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Ducote v. BolewareLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016