Legal Opinion

Valcaniant v. Detroit Edison Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2004No. Docket 121141PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether Detroit Edison Company owed plaintiff1 a legal duty to de-energize an overhead power line that was severed by equipment being operated under plaintiffs direction. Relying on Groncki v Detroit Edison Co, 453 Mich 644; 557 NW2d 289 (1996), the Court of Appeals held that Edison had no reason to foresee plaintiffs injury because it had no reason to foresee that plaintiff *84was the cause of the fault and, as a result, did not owe a legal duty to plaintiff.2 We affirm.

i

In 1974, plaintiff purchased a four-acre gravel lot in Imlay City; in 1987, he opened…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lucas v. AwaadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. In Re Baldwin TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Rakowski v. SarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API