Valcaniant v. Detroit Edison Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether Detroit Edison Company owed plaintiff1 a legal duty to de-energize an overhead power line that was severed by equipment being operated under plaintiffs direction. Relying on Groncki v Detroit Edison Co, 453 Mich 644; 557 NW2d 289 (1996), the Court of Appeals held that Edison had no reason to foresee plaintiffs injury because it had no reason to foresee that plaintiff *84was the cause of the fault and, as a result, did not owe a legal duty to plaintiff.2 We affirm.
i
In 1974, plaintiff purchased a four-acre gravel lot in Imlay City; in 1987, he opened…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Buczkowski v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Groncki v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by36 opinions
- Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Lucas v. AwaadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Baldwin TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rakowski v. SarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.