Taylor v. Girard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
The opinions filed in this case present a rather novel situation. Mr. Justice Morgan concludes that a writ of prohibition will not issue to prohibit the performance of a ministerial act, whether the act be one commanded by law, or one without authority of law; in which conclusion Honorable William A. Babcock, District Judge, concurs. On the other hand, Mr. Chief Justice Budge holds to the view that the plaintiff waived his right to prosecute this case, and, therefore, to have it heard upon its merits, by waiting until after the primary election. Mr. Justice Givens merely concurs in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Balderston v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- State Ex Rel. Birchmore v. State Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Perrault v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Williams v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.