Legal Opinion

In Re McClam's Estate

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1965No. 18303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

245 S.C. 315 (1965)

140 S.E.2d 478

In re the ESTATE of Creola C. McCLAM.

Moseley C. COLEMAN et al. Appellants,

v.

Robert W. COLEMAN et al., Respondents.

18303

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 10, 1965.

Messrs. Yarborough & Nettles, of Florence, S. Russell Floyd, of Lake City, James P. Mozingo, III, of Darlington, E. DeLance Poston, of Johnsonville, and H.F. Bell, of Chesterfield, for Appellants.

Messrs. Willcox, Hardee, Houck, Palmer & O'Farrell, and McEachin, Townsend & Zeigler, of Florence, Rogers E. Harrell, of Kingstree, and Thomas A. Evins, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

February 10, 1965.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SmallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Ex Parte: Tolbert: In Re: Tolbert's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Rowell v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Mcclam v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Parkman v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Dunlap v. Peoples National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API