Legal Opinion

Howard v. Pate

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 25, 1963No. 21976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

This intervention in a condemnation proceeding, where the land has been taken and the purchase money paid into court, seeks only to subject the funds to the intervenor’s claim because of an alleged fraudulent conveyance of the land in question by intervenor’s judgment-debtor to the person in whom title reposed when condemned. Thus the title to the land is not directly involved, but incidentally, which is not enough to give this court jurisdiction, nor does it otherwise come- within this court’s jurisdiction. Code Ann. § 2-3704 (Const. of 1945); Grant v. Oakey, 218 Ga.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boswell v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Grant v. OakeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Durden v. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waddell v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Alexander v. RozettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. DeKalb County v. JACKSON-ATLANTIC COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Acree Oil Co. v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Flournoy v. OlshanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API