Legal Opinion

McGinley v. Territory

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1908No. 1908, Okla. TPublished

Okla. T. Error from the District Court, Logan County; before Jno. H. Bur-ford, Judge. N. D. McGinley was convicted of embezzlement, and lie brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Plaintiff in error ('who, for convenience, will hereinafter be called defendant) was indicted for the crime of embezzlement in the district court of Logan county on the 29th day of November, 1905, which was a day of the regular October. 1905, term. The indictment contained six counts. On the trial however, the court withdrew from the jury all the counts except the second one, which count charges that the defendant, Me Gin-ley, being intrusted with six bonds, issued by school district No. 87 of Kay county, as agent of said school district No. 87, to sell the same, sold said bonds for the sum…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Miller v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Ex parte MoranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Aztec Mining Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Lafferty Mfg. Co. v. Acme Ry. Signal & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API