Cullison v. Triplett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
Robert L. Triplett sued David Cullison for the balance due on a promissory note executed by the defendant. The defendant for answer alleged that plaintiff was indebted to defendant growing out of other transactions between the parties, and in an amount in excess of any balance due on the note. The case was placed on the court’s docket for April 15th, and was called for trial on April 16th.
On that date' an attorney for the defendr ant appeared and filed and presented a motion for a continuance. In the motion it is stated that the defendant ■ is unable to attend trial because of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beck v. PeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Borman v. GeibSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Atkins v. BeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Bookout v. Great Plains Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Mullins v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Anderson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Matter of LehmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.