In Re Cordy
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The court is of the opinion that the part of section 224 of the Civil Code upon which the respondent relies, does not state all of the elements necessary to constitute abandonment, but only defines the circumstances under which the juvenile court can take charge of cases of that kind and determine whether or not there has been an abandonment, and that one of the things necessary to be shown to constitute abandonment is intent on the part of the parent to abandon the child. This evidence does not show such intent. It should be said that the lack of intent is not conclusively shown by the bald…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Davey v. Los Angeles County Bureau of AdoptionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of AkersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Horr v. CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In the Matter of the Adoption of Force, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Moch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.