Morrissey v. Yale University
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.
The motion for summary judgment now before the court presents the question whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, establishes the necessary elements of the torts of negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For the reasons briefly discussed, the necessary elements are not established here.
The evidence submitted to the court, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, establishes that *395Linda Morrissey, the plaintiff, was employed by Yale University (Yale) as an administrative assistant in the department of epidemiology and public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morrissey v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004