Legal Opinion

Wiese v. Granata

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 25518PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Walter Scott Wiese (Wiese) and respondent Vicki Lynn Granata (Granata) were divorced in February 1987, and custody of the parties’ daughter, Autumn, was awarded to Wiese. Autumn has remained in her father’s custody ever since.

On December 30, 1993, Granata filed an application for a temporary order for protection against domestic violence from Wiese. This application did not request a change in the custody of Autumn. The district court issued the requested temporary order for protection that same day. The district court’s order did not purport to alter child custody in any way.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Moser v. MoserNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dagher v. DagherNevada Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Wallace v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hopper v. HopperNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McDermott v. McDermottNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. GORDON VS. GEIGER (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API