Legal Opinion

Shackleford v. Brown

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Hon. James M. Dayis, Judge. This is a proceeding under Revised Statutes, sections seventy-five to seventy-eight, commenced in the probate court of Carroll county, by the executor of the ■estate of Sarah D. Wetherholt, deceased, against Thomas C. Brown, to recover possession of certain notes in his possession.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Hon. James M. Dayis, Judge. This is a proceeding under Revised Statutes, sections seventy-five to seventy-eight, commenced in the probate court of Carroll county, by the executor of the ■estate of Sarah D. Wetherholt, deceased, against Thomas C. Brown, to recover possession of certain notes in his possession. The latter answered, denying that he had any notes, bonds and papers, belonging to said estate, coupled with the statement that he held a package ■of papers, the contents of which were unknown to him, which was left with him by Mrs. Pulliam, and was…

1Per curiam

On the authority of the cases of Walters v. Ford, 74 Mo. 198, and McCord v. McCord, 77 Mo, 166, the judgment in this case is hereby affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walter v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Devol v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Johnson v. ColleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Foley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Martin v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Oglesby v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API